Airborne Contamination in IVF Labs
Since the birth of the first baby from in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) in 1978, assisted reproductive technology (ART) has grown in importance as techniques and success rates have continued to improve. Put simply, IVF involves mixing sperm and egg in a lab to create an embryo which is then replaced in a woman's womb to develop normally with success being measured in terms of live births. All cells, including gametes (sperm and egg) and embryos (bundles of cells) are very sensitive to laboratory conditions of temperature, pressure, composition of the medium they are handled and grown in, and also air quality. Both indoor and outdoor pollution can have a drastic impact upon the embryo and the success rate of IVF. An embryo in a laboratory setting is very vulnerable to outside influences, because it lacks the protection of the mother's body. This is even more significant given the trend to grow the embryo in the lab to the five day (blastocyst) stage which is thought more likely to achieve a successful pregnancy when implanted that earlier embryos. Therefore, managers of IVF labs owe it to their patients/clients to do everything possible to ensure optimal air quality.
FAQ about IVF and Pollution:
- How Does Indoor and Outdoor Pollution Affect Success Rates in IVF Labs?
- What are the Sources of VOCs in the IVF Lab?
- Are there Other Sources of Pollution that Affect the Success of IVF?
- How Can Air Quality in IVF Labs be Improved?
- Is there any Evidence that Improved Air Quality in the Lab Actually Improves IVF Success Rates?
How Does Indoor and Outdoor Pollution Affect Success Rates in IVF Labs?
Smokers need twice as many IVF attempts to achieve success compared to non-smokers. That simple fact tells us straight away that pollution is a potent factor in the IVF process. There was a landmark paper by Cohen et al in 1997 that discusses how just relocation of their lab and use of adhesive during floor replacement in a neighbouring building were enough to lower pregnancy rates. Further experiments on the impact of floor tile adhesive on the development of mouse embryos shed some light on the second observation – the product arrested growth of more than 90 per cent of the embryos at the two-cell stage. Another study, from Brazil, showed that exposure to particulate matter (PM10s) showed increased chance of miscarriage among women after both IVF and natural conception. More recently, the presence of nitrogen dioxide pollution (likely from traffic exhausts) both at a woman's home and around an IVF lab has been linked with lower IVF birth rates. Most of the research has focused upon the impact of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), fine particles and, as mentioned above, nitrogen dioxide, upon IVF success rates. When it comes to VOCs, levels of over one part per million (ppm) will lead to poor development of both mouse and human embryos.
What are the Sources of VOCs in the IVF Lab?
Volatile organic compounds are gases; they are invisible and do not settle as dust, as particles do. Therefore, all surfaces in an IVF lab may look perfectly clean yet they could still be contaminated by VOCs, which are generated either by sources within the lab or can enter from neighbouring rooms or even from outside the building. There are many different VOCs that may be present in the IVF lab, including formaldehyde, isopropanol, hydrocarbons such as xylene, and refrigerant components.
Sources of VOCs that compromise the air quality in an IVF lab include:
- Medical gases
- Steel cabinet bases
- Construction materials
- Cleaning products
- Instrument packs
Construction or renovation of labs, or of neighbouring rooms or buildings, may generate significant levels of VOCs. This means that VOCs may be present in embryo culture media and in the incubators used to grow a vulnerable embryo to the blastocyst (70-100 cell) stage before being implanted into the mother's womb.
Are there Other Sources of Pollution that Affect the Success of IVF?
Fine particles (less than 0.1 microns in size) also have an impact on IVF success. These are present in both outdoor pollution and from various mechanical processes that may take place within a lab.
How Can Air Quality in IVF Labs be Improved?
It has been suggested that VOC levels in IVF labs should be below 0.5ppm and preferably below 0.2ppm and the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health regulations set levels for dust and particles in workplaces. There are also regulations for labs involved in cell culture. Therefore the first step in improving air quality in the IVF lab is to have monitors and counters in place to assess levels of both VOCs and particles.
Then, levels of pollution should be controlled by either preventing their entry or removing them once they are in the lab. The approach taken will depend upon the location and characteristics of the lab, but technologies such as high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration, for fine particles, and activated charcoal absorption technologies, for VOCs clearly will play an important role. Photocatalytic oxidation, which uses ultraviolet light to activate a titanium dioxide catalyst to break down VOCs into harmless carbon dioxide and water is another useful technology
Is there any Evidence that Improved Air Quality in the Lab Actually Improves IVF Success Rates?
There has been a study in The Netherlands on the impact of a carbon-activated air filtration system (CODA) in cattle IVF (easier, ethically, to carry out experiments with and as important, in its way, as human IVF). The system was placed in the incubator where day 7 embryos were placed. The overall pregnancy rate was significantly improved by the presence of the air purification system in the incubator.
There is clearly much research to be done into how air quality factors impact upon human IVF success rates. Outdoor pollution, and a woman's exposure to it, is hard to control. But conditions inside the lab and, particularly, in the incubator, can use monitoring and purification technologies to boost the chances of IVF success.
Cohen J et al (1997) Ambient air and its potential effects on conception in vitro.Human Reproduction 12 (8); 1742-1749 http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/content/12/8/1742.full.pdf
Merton J et al Carbon-activated gas filtration during in vitro culture increased pregnancy rate following transfer of in vitro-produced bovine embryos (2007). Theriogenology 67 (7); 1233-1238 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17331571
Legro R et al (2010) The effect of air quality on assisted human reproduction. Human Reproduction 25 (5) ; 1317-1324 http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/content/25/5/1317.long